![]()
|
|
ISAT StudyInternational Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R. Lancet. 2002: 360: 1267-74. Purpose: Determine whether endovascular treatment compared with neurosurgical treatment reduced the proportion of patients dependent or dead, defined by a modified Rankin score of 3-6 Methods: 2143 patients randomly assigned endovascular coil treatment (n=1070) or neurosurgical clipping (n=1073). Most randomized patients had good-grade (88 percent in WFNS grades I and II), small anterior circulation aneurysms (92 percent less than 11 mm in size). Results:
Conclusions:In ruptured brain aneurysm patients, equally suited for both treatment options, endovascular coil treatment produces substantially better patient outcomes than surgery in terms of survival free of disability at one year. * All adverse events, retreatments, rebleeds included in 1 year data. One-year data on 1,888 patients demonstrated a relative risk reduction of 26.8% in favor of coiling, an absolute risk reduction of 8.7%. Reference: Kerr R. The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial: What have we learned? Presentation at AANS Satellite Symposium: State of the Art Treatment for Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. April 28, 2003. 1 Year Patient Outcome 1,594 Patients:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|